The contract between professional sports players and clubs
It is only 10 years since the friendly A match against Japan was held in Sapporo, Japan (0-3 loss) in August 2011. Since 2011, Korea has won two wins, one draw and one loss in the EAFF E-1 Championship (formerly named the East 스포츠중계 Asian Cup).Korea has the upper hand in the history of Korea […]

It is only 10 years since the friendly A match against Japan was held in Sapporo, Japan (0-3 loss) in August 2011. Since 2011, Korea has won two wins, one draw and one loss in the EAFF E-1 Championship (formerly named the East 스포츠중계 Asian Cup).
Korea has the upper hand in the history of Korea and Japan with 42 wins, 23 draws and 14 losses in 79 matches, and even if the game is calculated in Japan, it is also ahead of 30 games with 16 wins, 8 draws and 6 losses.
Yokohama Nissan Stadium is the venue for the 2002 Korea-Japan World Cup finals, where two Korea-Japan matches have been held. In March 1998, he lost 1-2 to Japan in the Dynasty Cup, and in December 2003 he lost 0-0 in the East Asian Cup.
“It is time for the national team to check their performance ahead of the four games in the 2022 Qatar World Cup Asian qualifiers in June and the final qualifying round for the World Cup starting in the second half of the year,” said Jeon Han-jin, secretary general of KFA. “We have difficulties with Corona 19, but we have decided to actively use the valuable A-match period considering the World Cup qualifiers in the future,” he said.
“We are already in talks with overseas clubs where the players are to be called. K-riggers separated the cohort from Paju NFC for the first seven days after returning home, and the rest of the 7th day returned to their team and finished negotiations with the government to play. “We will also ask the K-League team for cooperation,” he said.
The defendant (the club) signed a contract with the plaintiffs (the player) on January 21, 2015, from January 1 of the same year to December 31, 2017, and the annual salary is decided by negotiations every year. However, the defendant informed him that he would not attend the winter battery training by inviting him to transfer to other soccer teams, saying that he would classify the plaintiffs as non-power players in mid-October 2016.
However, when the plaintiffs' transfer to other football teams was not feasible, the defendant not only paid the plaintiffs at all from January 1, 2017, but did not proceed with any pay negotiations set out in the contract until around April 2017, when a considerable period elapsed from that date.
Meanwhile, the defendant proposed to terminate the agreement on the case by offering a settlement of 20 million won, equivalent to the minimum annual salary of soccer players set by the Korean Football Confederation, on February 23, 2017, but when the plaintiffs did not respond, the defendant asked the plaintiffs to sign the 2017 salary negotiations and return to training on the premise that the contract was being maintained on April 11 and 24.
It is reasonable to say that sports contracts are similar to employment contracts in that athletes provide physical activities to the club, and that the club has a duty of protection in the respect of the principle of trust for the player in that it is premised on group life such as camp and training.
The defendant is credited with indicating his intention to refuse to fulfill the plaintiffs by failing to pay the plaintiffs the above salary for a considerable period of time, or by not participating in basic training for maintaining physical strength and tactical skills. In addition, the defendant will say that the plaintiffs have violated their duty to respect their personality, prohibit discrimination, and protect their duties under the same rules by excluding them from club activities without special circumstances during the same period. 3. 31. Spring is valid that the contract for this case was terminated around the time.
Furthermore, the amount of damages caused by the termination of the defendant to compensate the plaintiff is the salary for 2017 that the plaintiffs were able to receive. As long as the salary negotiations for 2017 were not made between the plaintiff and the defendant, the salary that is the basis for calculating the above damages is valid for the year 2016
A professional sports player contract is a contract in which a player belongs to a club for a certain period of time for a club belonging to the league, participates in games and training according to the direction of the club, provides unique skills as a sports player for the club, and the club provides a contractual compensation in exchange for the activities of such player. The professional sports player contract is a typical labor supply contract, which is a contract for professional sports players to provide their own labor and pay the compensation for it. However, unlike the employment contract that provides their own labor comprehensively, it has a character as a contract contract in that it is a professional sports player and only a training and game for preparation for the game. It can be said that it also has a character as a contract.
The court's position on the nature of professional sports player contracts is not clear, but the Seoul Civil Court 1985. 4. 3.In the sentence of 84-a-decision 1302, "Athletes belonging to Daewoo Royals Football Club, a professional soccer team belonging to the plaintiffs, live in a sports club training camp, and participate in the game according to the schedule of the regular league from April to November. "The legal nature of the 'substantial professional soccer player exclusive contract' is not a simple labor contract, but a non-contractive unknown contract with a contractual nature that is designed only for training and game competition as a soccer player

답글 남기기

이메일 주소를 발행하지 않을 것입니다. 필수 항목은 *(으)로 표시합니다